{"title":"Series: Chicago Studies in American Politics","description":"\u003cp\u003eThe \u003cstrong\u003eChicago Studies in American Politics\u003c\/strong\u003e series offers insightful explorations into the forces shaping political thought and social change in the United States. Readers can expect a rich blend of biographical narratives, cultural analysis, and commentary on political movements that illuminate the complexities of American public life from multiple perspectives.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eSpanning themes from civil rights to political strategy, these works engage with history, policy, and personal experience, inviting reflection on leadership, justice, and society. Whether through scholarly investigation or compelling storytelling, the series deepens understanding of the dynamic interplay between politics and culture.\u003c\/p\u003e","products":[{"product_id":"divided-parties-strong-leaders-by-ruth-bloch-rubin-9780226841847","title":"Divided Parties, Strong Leaders","description":"\u003cdiv class=\"book-description\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eDrawing on nearly a century of legislative history, this careful account invites readers to think anew about when, why, and how leaders of divided parties wield power in Congress.\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFor decades, legislative scholars have viewed party divisions as critical constraints on congressional leadership. The more a party’s rank and file disagree with one another, the weaker their leaders are predicted to be; as member preferences converge, leader power is thought to increase.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eIn a powerful corrective to this prevailing view, Ruth Bloch Rubin argues that party divisions are not inherently limiting. \u003cem\u003eDivided Parties, Strong Leaders\u003c\/em\u003e highlights and examines variation in how members of party factions choose to work together. She shows that leaders of divided parties are well positioned to overcome, and even draw strength from, their divided ranks when the collaborative efforts of their coalitions’ competing factions are evenly matched. By contrast, their capacity to get what they want is more limited when one faction has out-collaborated its competition.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003ePresenting detailed case studies of some of the most storied leaders of the postwar Congress, including Speakers Sam Rayburn and Nancy Pelosi, Bloch Rubin analyses the factional configuration each leader encountered and explains why it mattered for their exercise of power.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Unknown","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":46790369313004,"sku":"9780226841847","price":61.99,"currency_code":"NZD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0705\/7784\/8556\/files\/1f5ff0154a7fdade9c2206a3cbbbd59e.jpg?v=1757060386"},{"product_id":"legal-plunder-by-joe-soss-9780226841168","title":"Legal Plunder","description":"\u003cdiv class=\"book-description\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eA searing, historically rich account of how US policing and punishment have been retrofitted over the last four decades to extract public and private revenues from America's poorest and most vulnerable communities.\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eAlongside the rise of mass incarceration, a second profound and equally disturbing development has transpired. Since the 1980s, US policing and punishment have been remade into tools for stripping resources from the nation's most oppressed communities and turning them into public and private revenues. \u003cem\u003eLegal Plunder\u003c\/em\u003e analyses this development's origins, operations, consequences, and the political struggles that it has created.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eDrawing on historical and contemporary evidence, including original ethnographic research, Joshua Page and Joe Soss examine the predatory dimensions of criminal legal governance to show how practices that criminalise, police, and punish have been retrofitted to siphon resources from subordinated groups, subsidise governments, and generate corporate profits. As tax burdens have declined for the affluent, this financial extraction—now a core function of the country's sprawling criminal legal apparatus—further compounds race, class, and gender inequalities and injustices. \u003cem\u003eLegal Plunder\u003c\/em\u003e shows that we can no longer afford to overlook legal plunder or the efforts to dismantle it.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Unknown","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":46792012595436,"sku":"9780226841168","price":90.0,"currency_code":"NZD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0705\/7784\/8556\/files\/ed224f51777558232edf48782f27a85e.jpg?v=1757060479"},{"product_id":"the-money-signal-by-danielle-m-thomsen-9780226841144","title":"The Money Signal","description":"\u003cdiv class=\"book-description\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eA data-rich, eye-opening look at how, when, and why political fundraising is consequential.\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eOver the last two decades, the number of competitive congressional races has declined precipitously. Yet candidates and officeholders dial for more and more dollars each election, and they do so earlier and earlier in the campaign cycle.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eIn \u003cem\u003eThe Money Signal\u003c\/em\u003e, Danielle M. Thomsen offers a new perspective on the role of money in politics. She shows that fundraising matters because it is widely used as an indicator of a candidate's viability and strength, which shapes subsequent donations, dropout decisions, media attention, and rewards in office. Put simply, money is a focal point that candidates, donors, journalists, and party leaders rally around. For candidates, fundraising is a highly public form of self-presentation that pays dividends long before the election and well after the votes are cast.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eThomsen draws on comprehensive fundraising data that spans more than four decades, in addition to interviews, surveys of candidates and donors, newspaper coverage, committee assignments, and legislative success. \u003cem\u003eThe Money Signal\u003c\/em\u003e highlights the numerous ways that dollars influence the perceptions and behaviour of key actors and observers throughout the election cycle.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Unknown","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":46795461066988,"sku":"9780226841144","price":61.99,"currency_code":"NZD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0705\/7784\/8556\/files\/20639723482268.jpg?v=1757031324"},{"product_id":"a-tolerance-for-inequality-by-andrew-j-taylor-9780226843643","title":"A Tolerance for Inequality","description":"\u003cdiv class=\"book-description\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eA nuanced reassessment of US democratic responsiveness and public opinion on economic policy that explores the real reasons government does not do more to mitigate inequality.\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMany believe that the United States' growing economic inequality is the result of a political system that has been captured by wealthy elites. But is economic capture actually the problem? In \u003cem\u003eA Tolerance for Inequality\u003c\/em\u003e, Andrew J. Taylor examines this question from multiple angles, drawing on public opinion data and analyses of representation in Congress. Taylor finds that economic policy outcomes are more reflective of public opinion than the common wisdom suggests.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eBroadly, less-affluent Americans' policy preferences are not meaningfully different from the preferences of other Americans, and Washington is responsive to these preferences. Although politicians are more affluent, on average, than most Americans, this does not prevent them from representing the economic views of their poorer constituents.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eToday's Democratic Party is more interested in regulation and supplying public goods than redistributing wealth downwards, and political reforms designed to provide more equal outcomes are largely misguided. In short, Americans get the kind of economy they at least say they want.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Unknown","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":46871335174380,"sku":"9780226843643","price":61.99,"currency_code":"NZD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0705\/7784\/8556\/files\/02754b7edd1692a70572c6e9cd1ce3f0.jpg?v=1759876518"},{"product_id":"the-adaptability-paradox-by-stephen-skowronek-9780226844886","title":"The Adaptability Paradox","description":"\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eHas American democracy outstripped its constitutional accommodations?\u003c\/strong\u003e \u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eFaith in the resilience and adaptability of the US Constitution rests on a long history of finding new ways to make the system work. In \u003cem\u003eThe Adaptability Paradox\u003c\/em\u003e, political scientist Stephen Skowronek examines the rearrangements that regenerated the American government in the past and brings that experience to bear on our current predicament. He shows how a constitution framed in writing some 230 years ago can run into serious difficulties directly related to its long and impressive history of adaptation. \u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eSkowronek connects questions about the Constitution's adaptability to the challenges of democratization. For most of American history, serial rearrangements of constitutional relationships widened the government's purview as a national democracy without giving either nationalism or democracy free rein. Skowronek argues that the politics of adaptation shifted fundamentally with the \"Rights Revolution\" of the 1960s and `70s when American national democracy approached the inclusion of all its citizens on equal footing. Since then, power and authority have been reconfigured in ways that have steadily magnified conflicts over the essentials of good order. Conservatives aim to dismantle a Constitution that progressives are intent on building upon, and the consensus necessary for a constitutional democracy to function effectively has all but evaporated. No longer a socially bound framework for national action, the Constitution has become an abstract matrix of possibilities, a disembodied opportunity structure open to starkly different, mutually unacceptable futures. \u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eRather than being liberated by this unbound Constitution, the American people now appear entrapped by it. Is it possible that the development of American democracy has exhausted the adaptive capacities of the Constitution? A timely reminder that constitutional democracies do not survive on faith alone, \u003cem\u003eThe Adaptability Paradox \u003c\/em\u003eis a sober appraisal of the unfamiliar ground on which we now tread.\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Unknown","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":46871514644716,"sku":"9780226844886","price":49.99,"currency_code":"NZD","in_stock":false}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0705\/7784\/8556\/files\/20677143482268.jpg?v=1759882892"},{"product_id":"everyday-democracy-by-james-m-glaser-9780226845104","title":"Everyday Democracy","description":"\u003cdiv class=\"book-description\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eHow the everyday habits and attitudes of ordinary liberals and conservatives shape the health of American democracy.\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eIn \u003cem\u003eEveryday Democracy\u003c\/em\u003e, Jeffrey M. Berry, James M. Glaser, and Deborah J. Schildkraut study Americans' views of several manifestations of \"everyday democracy,\" which they define as the attitudes, behaviours, and processes that people experience in daily life and their routine considerations of politics and community. Examples include engaging in dialogue with political opponents and giving politicians licence to compromise. Ordinary political moments like these constitute much of politics, and they can lay the foundation that shapes if, when, and how crisis moments unfold.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003ePaying particular attention to the role of ideology in shaping how Americans emulate daily democratic ideals, this book considers such questions as: How do liberals and conservatives support different aspects of democratic practice, and are there ideological asymmetries between the two groups? If and when asymmetries emerge, what factors might explain them? The authors consider what their findings mean for the health of American democracy broadly.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Unknown","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":47031786471660,"sku":"9780226845104","price":113.0,"currency_code":"NZD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0705\/7784\/8556\/files\/20679323482268.jpg?v=1764147669"},{"product_id":"dynamic-democracy-by-christopher-warshaw-9780226822228","title":"Dynamic Democracy","description":"\u003cdiv class=\"book-description\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eDynamic Democracy\u003c\/em\u003e offers a new perspective on policy responsiveness in American government.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eScholars of American politics have long been sceptical of ordinary citizens’ capacity to influence, let alone control, their governments. Drawing on over eight decades of state-level evidence on public opinion, elections, and policymaking, Devin Caughey and Christopher Warshaw pose a powerful challenge to this pessimistic view. Their research reveals that although American democracy cannot be taken for granted, state policymaking is far more responsive to citizens’ demands than sceptics claim.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eAlthough governments respond sluggishly in the short term, over the long term, electoral incentives induce state parties and politicians—and ultimately policymaking—to adapt to voters’ preferences. The authors take an empirical and theoretical approach that allows them to assess democracy as a dynamic process. Their evidence across states and over time gives them new leverage to assess relevant outcomes and trends, including the evolution of mass partisanship, mass ideology, and the relationship between partisanship and ideology since the mid-twentieth century; the nationalisation of state-level politics; the mechanisms through which voters hold incumbents accountable; the performance of moderate candidates relative to extreme candidates; and the quality of state-level democracy today relative to state-level democracy in other periods.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Unknown","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":47424069566700,"sku":"9780226822228","price":64.99,"currency_code":"NZD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0705\/7784\/8556\/files\/9780226822228.jpg?v=1774769232"},{"product_id":"false-front-by-kenneth-lowande-9780226837253","title":"False Front","description":"\u003cdiv class=\"book-description\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eA provocative new perspective on presidential power.\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eBorder walls, school bathrooms, student loans, gun control, diversity, abortion, climate change—today, nothing seems out of reach for the president's pen. But after all the press releases, ceremonies, and speeches, shockingly little gets done. The American presidency promises to solve America's problems, but presidents' unilateral solutions are often weak, even empty.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eKenneth Lowande argues this is no accident. The US political system is not set up to allow presidents to solve major policy problems, yet it lays these problems at their doorstep, and there is no other elected official better positioned to attract attention by appearing to govern. Like any politician, presidents are strategic actors who seek symbolic wins. They pursue executive actions, even when they know that these will fail, because doing so allows them to put on a compelling show for key constituencies.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eBut these empty presidential actions are not without their costs: they divert energy from effective government—and, over time, undermine public trust. Drawing on thousands of executive actions, news coverage, interviews, and presidential archives, \u003cem\u003eFalse Front\u003c\/em\u003e shows that the real root of presidential power is in what presidents can get away with \u003cem\u003enot\u003c\/em\u003e doing.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Unknown","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":47424108200172,"sku":"9780226837253","price":56.99,"currency_code":"NZD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0705\/7784\/8556\/files\/9780226837253.jpg?v=1774769120"},{"product_id":"americas-new-racial-battle-lines-by-rogers-m-smith-9780226834047","title":"America’s New Racial Battle Lines","description":"\u003cdiv class=\"book-description\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eA sobering portrait of the United States' divided racial politics.\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFor nearly two decades, Rogers M. Smith and Desmond King have charted the shifting racial policy alliances that have shaped American politics across different eras. In \u003cem\u003eAmerica's New Racial Battle Lines\u003c\/em\u003e, they show that US racial policy debates are undergoing fundamental change. Disputes over colourblind versus race-conscious policies have given way to new lines of conflict. Today's conservatives promise to protect traditionalist, predominantly white, Christian Americans against what they call the \"radical\" Left. Meanwhile, today's progressives seek not just to integrate American institutions but to more fully transform and \"repair\" pervasive systemic racism.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eDrawing on interviews with activists, surveys, social network analyses, and comprehensive reviews of federal, state, and local policies and advocacy groups, Smith and King map the memberships and goals of two rival racial policy alliances and delineate the contrasting stories each side tells. They also show that these increasingly polarised racial policy alliances are substantially funded on both the Left and Right.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003ePlacing today's conflicts in theoretical and historical perspectives, Smith and King analyse where these intensifying clashes may take the nation in the years ahead. They highlight the great potential for mounting violence, as well as the remaining possibilities for finding common ground.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Unknown","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":47429759631596,"sku":"9780226834047","price":56.99,"currency_code":"NZD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0705\/7784\/8556\/files\/9780226834047.jpg?v=1774559933"},{"product_id":"countermobilization-by-eric-m-patashnik-9780226829890","title":"Countermobilization","description":"\u003cdiv class=\"book-description\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eAn essential look at how and why backlash movements are inherent to US policymaking.\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eThe most successful policies not only solve problems; they also build supportive coalitions. Yet, sometimes, policies trigger backlash and mobilise opposition. Although backlash is not a new phenomenon, today’s political landscape is distinguished by the frequency and pervasiveness of backlash in nearly every area of US policymaking, from abortion rights to the Affordable Care Act.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eEric M. Patashnik develops a policy-centred theory of backlash that illuminates how policies stimulate backlashes by imposing losses, overreaching, or challenging existing arrangements to which people are strongly attached. Drawing on case studies of issues from immigration and trade to healthcare and gun control, \u003ci\u003eCountermobilization\u003c\/i\u003e shows that backlash politics is fuelled by polarisation, cultural shifts, and negative feedback from the activist government itself. It also offers crucial insights to help identify and navigate backlash risks.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Unknown","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":47430335135980,"sku":"9780226829890","price":61.99,"currency_code":"NZD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0705\/7784\/8556\/files\/9780226829890.jpg?v=1774559157"},{"product_id":"our-common-bonds-by-matthew-levendusky-9780226824703","title":"Our Common Bonds","description":"\u003cdiv class=\"book-description\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA compelling exploration of concrete strategies to reduce partisan animosity by building on what Democrats and Republicans have in common.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eOne of the defining features of twenty-first-century American politics is the rise of affective polarization: Americans increasingly not only disagree with those from the other party but distrust and dislike them as well. This has toxic downstream consequences for both politics and social relationships. Is there any solution?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eOur Common Bonds\u003c\/em\u003e shows that—although there is no silver bullet that will eradicate partisan animosity—there are concrete interventions that can reduce it. Matthew Levendusky argues that partisan animosity stems in part from partisans’ misperceptions of one another. Democrats and Republicans \u003cem\u003ethink\u003c\/em\u003e they have nothing in common, but this is not true.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eDrawing on survey and experimental evidence, the book shows that it is possible to help partisans reframe the lens through which they evaluate the out-party by priming commonalities—specifically, shared identities outside of politics, cross-party friendships, and common issue positions and values identified through civil cross-party dialogue. Doing so lessons partisan animosity, and it can even reduce ideological polarization.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eThe book discusses what these findings mean for real-world efforts to bridge the partisan divide.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Unknown","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":47431787217132,"sku":"9780226824703","price":64.99,"currency_code":"NZD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0705\/7784\/8556\/files\/9780226824703.jpg?v=1774557153"},{"product_id":"respect-and-loathing-in-american-democracy-by-elizabeth-theiss-morse-9780226831732","title":"Respect and Loathing in American Democracy","description":"\u003cdiv class=\"book-description\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eA deep examination of why respect is in short supply in politics today and why it matters.\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eRespect is in trouble in the United States. Many Americans believe respecting others is a necessary virtue, yet many struggle to respect opposing partisans. Surprisingly, it is liberal citizens, who hold respect as central to their view of democratic equality, who often have difficulty granting respect to others. Drawing on evidence from national surveys, focus groups, survey experiments, and the views of political theorists, Jeff Spinner-Halev and Elizabeth Theiss-Morse explain why this is and why respect is vital to—and yet so lacking in—contemporary US politics.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cem\u003eRespect and Loathing in American Democracy\u003c\/em\u003e argues that liberals and conservatives are less divided than many believe, but alienate one another because they moralize different issues. Liberals moralize social justice, conservatives champion national solidarity, and this worldview divide keeps them at odds.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eRespect is both far-reaching and vital, yet it is much harder to grant than many recognize, partly because of the unseen tension between respect, social justice, and national solidarity. \u003cem\u003eRespect and Loathing in American Democracy\u003c\/em\u003e proposes a path forward that, while challenging, is far from impossible for citizens to traverse.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Unknown","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":47432187674860,"sku":"9780226831732","price":47.99,"currency_code":"NZD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0705\/7784\/8556\/files\/9780226831732.jpg?v=1774555543"},{"product_id":"moral-issues-by-paul-goren-9780226836676","title":"Moral Issues","description":"\u003cdiv class=\"book-description\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eA new perspective on how beliefs about abortion and gay rights reshaped American politics.\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMany believe that religious and partisan identities undergird American public opinion. However, when it comes to abortion and gay rights, the reverse may be closer to the truth.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eDrawing on wide-ranging evidence, Paul Goren and Christopher Chapp show that views on abortion and gay rights are just as durable and politically impactful—and often more so—than political and religious identities. Goren and Chapp locate the lasting strength of stances on abortion and gay rights in the automatic, visceral emotions that the media has primed since the late 1980s. \u003cem\u003eMoral Issues\u003c\/em\u003e examines how attitudes toward these moralized issues affect, and can sometimes even disrupt, religious and partisan identities.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eIndeed, over the last thirty years, these attitudes have accelerated the rise of the religious \"nones,\" who have no religious affiliation, and promoted moral sorting into the Democratic and Republican parties.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Unknown","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":47461179490540,"sku":"9780226836676","price":61.99,"currency_code":"NZD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0705\/7784\/8556\/files\/9780226836676-moral-issues.jpg?v=1774961238"},{"product_id":"through-the-grapevine-by-taylor-n-carlson-9780226834177","title":"Through the Grapevine","description":"\u003cdiv class=\"book-description\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAn enlightening examination of what it means when Americans rely on family and friends to stay on top of politics.\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eAccurate information is at the heart of democratic functioning. For decades, researchers interested in how information is disseminated have focused on mass media, but the reality is that many Americans today do not learn about politics from direct engagement with the news. Rather, about one-third of Americans learn chiefly from information shared by their peers in conversation or on social media. How does this socially transmitted information differ from that communicated by traditional media? What are the consequences for political attitudes and behaviour?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eDrawing on evidence from experiments, surveys, and social media, Taylor N. Carlson finds that, as information flows first from the media then person to person, it becomes sparse, more biased, less accurate, and more mobilising. The result is what Carlson calls \u003cem\u003edistorted democracy\u003c\/em\u003e. Although socially transmitted information does not necessarily render democracy dysfunctional, \u003cem\u003eThrough the Grapevine\u003c\/em\u003e shows how it contributes to a public that is at once underinformed, polarised, \u003cem\u003eand\u003c\/em\u003e engaged.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Unknown","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":47461690605804,"sku":"9780226834177","price":61.99,"currency_code":"NZD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0705\/7784\/8556\/files\/9780226834177-through-the-grapevine.jpg?v=1774975235"},{"product_id":"how-politicians-polarize-by-mia-costa-9780226838946","title":"How Politicians Polarize","description":"\u003cdiv class=\"book-description\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eA fresh examination of political representation in an era of negative partisanship.\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eWhat does representation look like when politicians focus on \"othering\" the opposing party rather than the policy interests of their constituents? How do voters react to negative partisan rhetoric? And is policy responsiveness still the cornerstone of American representative democracy?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eIn \u003cem\u003eHow Politicians Polarize\u003c\/em\u003e, Mia Costa draws on survey experiments, analysis of congressional newsletters and tweets, and data on fundraising and media coverage to examine how and why politicians rely so often on negative partisan attacks. Costa shows that most Americans do not like negative rhetoric, and politicians know this. Nonetheless, these kinds of attacks can reap powerful rewards from national media, donors, and party elites.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eCosta's findings challenge the popular notion that Americans are motivated more by their partisan identities than by policy representation. Her research illuminates how the political ecosystem rewards negative representation and how this affects the quality of American democracy.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Unknown","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":47463184105708,"sku":"9780226838946","price":61.99,"currency_code":"NZD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0705\/7784\/8556\/files\/9780226838946-how-politicians-polarize.jpg?v=1775029469"},{"product_id":"partisan-hostility-and-american-democracy-by-matthew-levendusky-9780226833675","title":"Partisan Hostility and American Democracy","description":"\u003cdiv class=\"book-description\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAn unflinching examination of the effects and boundaries of partisan animosity.\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFor generations, experts argued that American politics needed cohesive parties to function effectively. Now many fear that strong partisan views, particularly hostility to the opposing party, are damaging democracy. Is partisanship as dangerous as we fear it is?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eTo provide an answer, \u003cem\u003ePartisan Hostility and American Democracy\u003c\/em\u003e offers a nuanced evaluation of when and how partisan animosity matters in today's highly charged, dynamic political environment, drawing on panel data from some of the most tumultuous years in recent American history, 2019 through 2021. The authors show that partisanship powerfully shapes political behaviours, but its effects are conditional, not constant. Instead, it is most powerful when politicians send clear signals and when an issue is unlikely to bring direct personal consequences. In the absence of these conditions, other factors often dominate decision-making.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eThe authors argue that while partisan hostility has degraded US politics—for example, politicising previously non-political issues and undermining compromise—it is not in itself an existential threat. As their research shows, the future of American democracy depends on how politicians, more than ordinary voters, behave.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Unknown","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":47471331213548,"sku":"9780226833675","price":56.99,"currency_code":"NZD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0705\/7784\/8556\/files\/9780226833675-partisan-hostility-and-american-democracy.jpg?v=1775239862"},{"product_id":"the-politics-of-skin-tone-by-nicole-d-yadon-9780226840352","title":"The Politics of Skin Tone","description":"\u003cdiv class=\"book-description\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eA nuanced examination of the salience of skin tone within African American politics.\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eResearch shows that skin tone is associated with significant differences in life experiences. On average, African Americans with darker skin earn lower wages, suffer worse health outcomes, and endure more negative criminal justice experiences than lighter-skinned African Americans. Nicole D. Yadon conceptualises skin tone as one facet of the multidimensional construct of race that powerfully influences racialised experiences which, in turn, can influence political identities and attitudes.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eDrawing on evidence from one hundred in-depth interviews, multiple surveys, and a survey experiment, \u003cem\u003eThe Politics of Skin Tone\u003c\/em\u003e investigates the political associations of skin tone. Yadon finds that skin tone correlates with political attitudes, particularly on issues where colour-based disparities are especially pronounced such as criminal justice. Moreover, a sizeable number of African Americans adopt a skin tone-based identity. In an era of shifting racial boundaries and growing colour-based discrimination, \u003cem\u003eThe Politics of Skin Tone\u003c\/em\u003e examines the implications for both scholars and policymakers.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Unknown","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":47471821291756,"sku":"9780226840352","price":61.99,"currency_code":"NZD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0705\/7784\/8556\/files\/0736621ca4e8256f2b88979676844197.jpg?v=1775694463"},{"product_id":"post-racial-or-most-racial-by-michael-tesler-9780226353012","title":"Post-Racial or Most-Racial?","description":"\u003cdiv class=\"book-description\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhen Barack Obama won the presidency, many posited that we were entering into a post-racial period in American politics. Regrettably, the reality hasn’t lived up to that expectation. Instead, Americans’ political beliefs have become significantly \u003cem\u003emore\u003c\/em\u003e polarized by racial considerations than they had been before Obama’s presidency—in spite of his administration’s considerable efforts to neutralize the political impact of race.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMichael Tesler shows how, in the years that followed the 2008 election—a presidential election more polarized by racial attitudes than any other in modern times—racial considerations have come increasingly to influence many aspects of political decision making. These range from people’s evaluations of prominent politicians and the parties to issues seemingly unrelated to race like assessments of public policy or objective economic conditions. Some people even displayed more positive feelings toward Obama’s dog, Bo, when they were told he belonged to Ted Kennedy. More broadly, Tesler argues that the rapidly intensifying influence of race in American politics is driving the polarizing partisan divide and the vitriolic atmosphere that has come to characterize American politics.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eOne of the most important books on American racial politics in recent years, \u003cem\u003ePost-Racial or Most-Racial?\u003c\/em\u003e is required reading for anyone wishing to understand what has happened in the United States during Obama’s presidency and how it might shape the country long after he leaves office.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Ingram Book Company","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":47588989665516,"sku":"9780226353012","price":99.99,"currency_code":"NZD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0705\/7784\/8556\/files\/9780226353012-post-racial-or-most-racial.jpg?v=1777602902"},{"product_id":"persuasion-in-parallel-by-alexander-coppock-9780226821849","title":"Persuasion in Parallel","description":"\u003cdiv class=\"book-description\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eA bold re-examination of how political attitudes change in response to information.\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMany mistakenly believe that it is fruitless to try to persuade those who disagree with them about politics. However, \u003cem\u003ePersuasion in Parallel\u003c\/em\u003e shows that individuals do, in fact, change their minds in response to information, with partisans on either side of the political aisle updating their views roughly in parallel.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eThis book challenges the dominant view that persuasive information can often backfire because people are supposedly motivated to reason against information they dislike. Drawing on evidence from a series of randomised controlled trials, the book shows that the backfire response is rare to nonexistent. Instead, it shows that most everyone updates in the direction of information, at least a little bit.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eThe political upshot of this work is that the other side is not lost. Even messages we don't like can move us in the right direction.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Unknown","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":47597499547884,"sku":"9780226821849","price":135.0,"currency_code":"NZD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0705\/7784\/8556\/files\/40aad7332b5c9b64a6902ad0788679bf.jpg?v=1777958498"},{"product_id":"prisms-of-the-people-by-hahrie-han-9780226743905","title":"Prisms of the People","description":"\u003cdiv class=\"book-description\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eGrassroots organising and collective action have always been fundamental to American democracy but have been burgeoning since the 2016 election, as people struggle to make their voices heard in this moment of societal upheaval. Unfortunately, much of that action has not had the kind of impact participants might want, especially among movements representing the poor and marginalised who often have the most at stake when it comes to rights and equality. Yet, some instances of collective action have succeeded. What's the difference between a movement that wins victories for its constituents, and one that fails? What are the factors that make collective action powerful?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003e\u003ci\u003ePrisms of the People\u003c\/i\u003e addresses those questions and more. Using data from six movement organisations—including a coalition that organised a 104-day protest in Phoenix in 2010 and another that helped restore voting rights to the formerly incarcerated in Virginia—Hahrie Han, Elizabeth McKenna, and Michelle Oyakawa show that the power of successful movements most often is rooted in their ability to act as “prisms of the people,” turning participation into political power just as prisms transform white light into rainbows. Understanding the organisational design choices that shape the people, their leaders, and their strategies can help us understand how grassroots groups achieve their goals.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLinking strong scholarship to a deep understanding of the needs and outlook of activists, \u003ci\u003ePrisms of the People\u003c\/i\u003e is the perfect book for our moment—for understanding what’s happening and propelling it forward.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Unknown","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":47597538279660,"sku":"9780226743905","price":116.0,"currency_code":"NZD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0705\/7784\/8556\/files\/6a6f091223c2a90cca02f3015abc83b5.jpg?v=1777957902"},{"product_id":"legislating-in-the-dark-by-james-m-curry-9780226281711","title":"Legislating in the Dark","description":"\u003cdiv class=\"book-description\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe 2009 financial stimulus bill ran to more than 1,100 pages, yet it wasn’t even given to Congress in its final form until thirteen hours before debate was set to begin, and it was passed twenty-eight hours later. How are representatives expected to digest so much information in such a short time?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eThe answer? They aren’t. With \u003cem\u003eLegislating in the Dark\u003c\/em\u003e, James M. Curry reveals that the availability of information about legislation is a key tool through which Congressional leadership exercises power. Through a deft mix of legislative analysis, interviews, and participant observation, Curry shows how congresspersons—lacking the time and resources to study bills deeply themselves—are forced to rely on information and cues from their leadership. By controlling their rank-and-file’s access to information, Congressional leaders are able to emphasize or bury particular items, exploiting their information advantage to push the legislative agenda in directions that they and their party prefer.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eOffering an unexpected new way of thinking about party power and influence, \u003cem\u003eLegislating in the Dark\u003c\/em\u003e will spark substantial debate in political science.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Unknown","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":47603011813612,"sku":"9780226281711","price":68.99,"currency_code":"NZD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0705\/7784\/8556\/files\/9780226281711-legislating-in-the-dark.jpg?v=1778053073"},{"product_id":"politics-by-formula-by-leah-rosenstiel-9780226848327","title":"Politics by Formula","description":"\u003cdiv class=\"book-description\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eA clear-eyed study that reveals how politics shapes and often distorts important federal programs, driving inequalities across states.\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eFrom Medicaid to Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers, a large percentage of the annual US federal budget (approximately $1 trillion) is distributed through grants-in-aid, a policy tool that allocates aid to state and local governments rather than to individual Americans. When members of Congress use grants-in-aid to fund healthcare, housing, and other forms of support, they are not solely determining how much assistance one person receives. Instead, they can allot certain localities larger grants, which carry big implications for the quality of public services available to citizens living in different states.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMany reasonably assume that these assistance programs distribute funding to states impartially because they use statistical formulas based on population levels, poverty, and other characteristics that, ostensibly, measure need. However, in \u003ci\u003ePolitics by Formula\u003c\/i\u003e, Leah Rosenstiel shows how this seemingly technocratic aspect of federal policymaking is deeply affected by both the structure of political institutions and the motivations of elected officials. Key congressional committees—and especially their leaders—design formulas to benefit their constituencies. Superficially neutral formulas can shield these political decisions from scrutiny, but formulas also constrain congressmembers. Drawing on formal modeling and quantitative and qualitative evidence, Rosenstiel elucidates how these dynamics shape whose and what needs are met and where.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Unknown","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":47650171224300,"sku":"9780226848327","price":113.0,"currency_code":"NZD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0705\/7784\/8556\/files\/9780226848327-politics-by-formula.jpg?v=1779317660"},{"product_id":"paying-for-the-party-by-michael-r-kistner-9780226850221","title":"Paying for the Party","description":"\u003cdiv class=\"book-description\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eA revealing, data-rich exploration of how American legislators transformed from active policymakers into party fundraisers.\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eLawmakers in Congress and state legislatures across the United States spend enormous amounts of time and effort fundraising, not just for their own seats but for the party. Whether dialling for dollars or hosting high-priced fundraising events, the pursuit of campaign funds is now a massive part of the American legislator’s job description. What explains this transformation, and what are the consequences for public policy?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eIn \u003ci\u003ePaying for the Party\u003c\/i\u003e, Michael Kistner uses new theory and new data to answer these questions. He shows that state legislative party organisations—Democratic and Republican caucuses in capitols across the country—are responsible for turning their members into single-minded seekers of money. Parties reward legislators who contribute the most with powerful leadership and committee positions. Consequently, the members who now hold these agenda-setting positions are increasingly neither the most productive nor knowledgeable lawmakers, but rather those who can raise the most money. And when legislators are asked to raise more money, they skip committee hearings for fundraising events, enacting fewer substantive policies as a result. \u003ci\u003ePaying for the Party\u003c\/i\u003e shows that parties in contemporary American legislatures have hollowed out the policymaking capacity of their institutions and empowered a decidedly non-representative set of legislators.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Unknown","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":47932370157804,"sku":"9780226850221","price":104.0,"currency_code":"NZD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0705\/7784\/8556\/files\/9780226850221-paying-for-the-party.jpg?v=1783861041"},{"product_id":"rural-pain-republican-gain-by-michael-e-shepherd-9780226851792","title":"Rural Pain, Republican Gain","description":"\u003cdiv class=\"book-description\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAn eye-opening look at how Republican policies have affected health outcomes in rural communities and why poor, rural white voters are turning to the Republican Party—not despite this harm, but because of it.\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eOver the last four decades, the health of rural Americans has been in free fall. Just as opioid and gun deaths have ripped apart rural communities, hospitals have closed at alarming rates, leaving millions desperately far from care. At the same time, voters in struggling rural communities have increasingly come to vote for the Republican Party.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eIn \u003cem\u003eRural Pain, Republican Gain\u003c\/em\u003e, Michael E. Shepherd demonstrates that these two trends are closely connected. At both the federal and state levels, the Republican Party has increasingly enacted policies that worsen rural health. Rural voters are not indifferent to this development (quite the contrary), but they misassign blame, in part, because the Democratic Party is more commonly associated with health-related policy initiatives and has ownership of health as an issue area. Republican politicians can reap rewards from their own destructive policies by appealing to the shared grievances of rural people.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eShepherd draws on new, wide-ranging data, including in-depth studies of the opioid epidemic, hospital closures, and COVID-19. In so doing, he quantifies the harm of Republican policymaking and its disproportionate effect on rural communities, recasting how readers understand growing Republican support among less healthy, lower-income rural white Americans.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Unknown","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":48038444531948,"sku":"9780226851792","price":87.0,"currency_code":"NZD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0705\/7784\/8556\/files\/576b556f41c35a11cde987deea40f8c6.jpg?v=1787726747"},{"product_id":"echo-chambers-by-sorelle-w-gaynor-9780226855493","title":"Echo Chambers","description":"\u003cdiv class=\"book-description\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAn incisive analysis of how congressional communication with constituents has changed and what this means for representation and polarization.\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eMembers of Congress have a duty to talk to their constituents back home about what's going on in Washington. But today, the average politician lacks the time, resources, and knowledge necessary to coherently explain the bills and legislative actions up for debate. Therefore, they turn to those who hold the keys to the chamber: party leaders.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eConsequently, Congress is now more reliant than ever on its leaders' partisan talking points, and constituents hear more about nationalized political battles rather than the local issues affecting their districts. Drawing on large-scale text analysis, campaign expenditures, and congressional district data, as well as in-depth interviews, \u003cem\u003eEcho Chambers\u003c\/em\u003e examines how partisan communication took over Congress, the key differences in that messaging across parties and chambers, and what these combined forces mean for US citizens today.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Unknown","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":67807573410028,"sku":"9780226855493","price":61.99,"currency_code":"NZD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0705\/7784\/8556\/files\/9780226855493-echo-chambers-1.jpg?v=1792524545"},{"product_id":"the-fog-of-accountability-by-justin-de-benedictis-kessner-9780226849102","title":"The Fog of Accountability","description":"\u003cdiv class=\"book-description\"\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cstrong\u003eAn astute, data-rich examination of the structural reasons that elections fail to hold US city officials accountable.\u003c\/strong\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eIn the United States, hundreds of thousands of elected and appointed officials serve more than 50,000 subnational governments, making important decisions about services ranging from education to infrastructure to policing. The provision of critical city services shapes citizens' everyday lives.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\n\u003cp\u003eSupposedly, local politicians are the elected representatives closest to the people they serve, but are they actually accountable to their constituents? Justin de Benedictis-Kessner shows that they are not: local elections routinely fail to punish bad politicians or reward strong performers. \u003cem\u003eThe Fog of Accountability\u003c\/em\u003e argues that this is because urban politics is defined by minimally effective competition, complex institutions that confuse voters, and a lack of effective media coverage. These institutional features combine to stymie even well-intentioned voters and make accountability difficult. Fixing these problems is challenging, but, as de Benedictis-Kessner shows, change is possible if we can enable citizens to reclaim and assert their political power.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Unknown","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":67808255475948,"sku":"9780226849102","price":61.99,"currency_code":"NZD","in_stock":false}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0705\/7784\/8556\/files\/9780226849102-the-fog-of-accountability-1.jpg?v=1792530418"}],"url":"https:\/\/bookhero.pro\/collections\/series-chicago-studies-in-american-politics.oembed","provider":"Book Hero","version":"1.0","type":"link"}